--- title: "How To Reframe A Hard Thought: A Four Step Framework" description: "The reframe I use when a thought starts running me: name the story, ask what it's actually about, find the truer sentence, then act before the feeling clears." lang: en json-ld: | [ { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Person", "@id": "https://christianespinosa.com/#person", "name": "Christian Espinosa", "url": "https://christianespinosa.com/", "image": "https://christianespinosa.com/__l5e/assets-v1/de07e44b-a8e0-4bcc-bcb0-13aec15421f1/headshot-front.jpg", "sameAs": [ "https://www.facebook.com/christian.espinosa.official", "https://x.com/Ironracer", "https://www.instagram.com/christian.espinosa.official/", "https://www.youtube.com/@ChristianEspinosaOfficial", "https://www.linkedin.com/in/christianespinosa/" ], "jobTitle": "Bestselling Author, Keynote Speaker, Entrepreneur", "worksFor": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Blue Goat Cyber", "url": "https://bluegoatcyber.com/" } }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "WebSite", "@id": "https://christianespinosa.com/#website", "name": "Christian Espinosa", "url": "https://christianespinosa.com/", "publisher": { "@id": "https://christianespinosa.com/#organization" }, "inLanguage": "en-US" }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Organization", "@id": "https://christianespinosa.com/#organization", "name": "Christian Espinosa", "url": "https://christianespinosa.com/", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://christianespinosa.com/logo.svg" }, "founder": { "@id": "https://christianespinosa.com/#person" }, "sameAs": [ "https://www.facebook.com/christian.espinosa.official", "https://x.com/Ironracer", "https://www.instagram.com/christian.espinosa.official/", "https://www.youtube.com/@ChristianEspinosaOfficial", "https://www.linkedin.com/in/christianespinosa/" ] }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Article", "headline": "How To Reframe A Hard Thought: A Four Step Framework | Christian Espinosa", "description": "The reframe I use when a thought starts running me: name the story, ask what it's actually about, find the truer sentence, then act before the feeling clears.", "image": "https://christianespinosa.com/blog/reframe-lens-dawn.jpg", "datePublished": "2026-07-22T14:00:00Z", "dateModified": "2026-07-22T14:00:00Z", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://christianespinosa.com/blog/how-to-reframe-a-four-step-framework" }, "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Christian Espinosa", "url": "https://christianespinosa.com/about" }, "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Christian Espinosa", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://christianespinosa.com/logo.svg" } } }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "Is this the same as positive thinking?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "No, and that's the point. Positive thinking swaps a hard sentence for a nicer one, and your nervous system usually rejects the nicer one inside an hour. This framework insists the new sentence be truer than the old one, not nicer, which is why it holds up on a bad day." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What if I can't find a truer sentence?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Then Step 2 isn't done. If no truer sentence will come, the feeling is usually still made of layers you haven't separated yet. Sit longer with what the thought is actually about before you go looking for the reframe." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Doesn't acting before the feeling clears just mean bulldozing through emotions?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "No. Bulldozing is acting without doing Steps 1 through 3. Acting on a reframe you've actually earned is different, because you've already named the feeling, understood its layers, and found a sentence you can defend. The discomfort is present; it just isn't in charge." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Where does this connect to your book?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "[The In-Between: Life in the Micro](https://www.amazon.com/Between-Life-Micro-Christian-Espinosa-ebook/dp/B0CP8RYV55) is built on the idea that the space between the big events is where the actual life happens. This framework is what I use to keep the small moments from being run by stories that aren't true. Same thesis, applied at the level of a single hard thought." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Does this work on grief, or only on decisions?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "It works on both, but slower on grief. Grief has appropriate weight that never fully lifts, and the honest sentence is often just \"this hurts and it should.\" The reframe in grief is usually not that the loss wasn't a loss, but that carrying it well is part of honoring what was lost." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "For each edge case, what sentence should I actually replace in my draft?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Use this as a cheat sheet when the framework bends. Ending a contractor or teammate: replace \"I'm breaking my word\" with \"I made a promise the business couldn't hold, and the honest move is to say so now.\" Hard conversation with a spouse: replace \"I'm disappointing her\" with \"I'm telling her the truth about what I can carry this week, which is what a real partner does.\" Boundary with a parent: replace \"I'm being a bad son or daughter\" with \"I'm choosing the version of this relationship that can last another twenty years.\" Long-term friendship that has quietly stopped fitting: replace \"I'm abandoning them\" with \"I'm letting a season end so I stop pretending it hasn't.\" Being the one who got ended: replace \"this shouldn't be happening\" with \"this is what actually is, and I get to choose who I am on the other side of it.\" Grief: don't replace the sentence at all; sit with \"this hurts and it should\" until it changes on its own timeline." } } ] } ] --- [Skip to content](#main) [](/) [About](/about)[Speaking](/speaking)[Cybersecurity](/cybersecurity)[Programs](/programs)[Books](/books)[Media](/media) Writing Search Ctrl K[Connect](/connect) [The In-Between](/blog/category/the-in-between) # How To Reframe A Hard Thought In Four Steps July 22, 2026 17 min read 3,642 words It was 6:47 in the morning and I was rewriting the same paragraph in my head for the third day in a row. A contractor I liked was about to lose the role we had once talked about turning into a full-time seat. The business couldn't carry it. I knew what I had to do. I couldn't get myself to do it. Not because the decision was wrong; because the guilt about the decision was doing all the driving. ![](/blog/reframe-lens-dawn.jpg) Published July 22, 2026 Read time 17 min In this essay 1. [01 Step 1: Say The Honest Sentence Out Loud ](#step-1-say-the-honest-sentence-out-loud) 2. [02 Step 2: Ask What It's Actually About ](#step-2-ask-what-its-actually-about) 3. [03 Step 3: Find The Truer Sentence, Not The Nicer One ](#step-3-find-the-truer-sentence-not-the-nicer-one) 4. [04 Step 4: Act Before The Feeling Clears ](#step-4-act-before-the-feeling-clears) 5. [05 Where This Framework Bends ](#where-this-framework-bends) 6. [06 Your Turn ](#your-turn) 7. [07 The Takeaway ](#the-takeaway) Jump to 1. [01 Step 1: Say The Honest Sentence Out Loud ](#step-1-say-the-honest-sentence-out-loud) 2. [02 Step 2: Ask What It's Actually About ](#step-2-ask-what-its-actually-about) 3. [03 Step 3: Find The Truer Sentence, Not The Nicer One ](#step-3-find-the-truer-sentence-not-the-nicer-one) 4. [04 Step 4: Act Before The Feeling Clears ](#step-4-act-before-the-feeling-clears) 5. [05 Where This Framework Bends ](#where-this-framework-bends) 6. [06 Your Turn ](#your-turn) 7. [07 The Takeaway ](#the-takeaway) The takeaways 1. 01 A reframe is not a nicer story about a hard thing; it's a truer, larger story that the hard one fits inside of. 2. 02 Start by saying the ugly, honest version of the thought out loud. The pain of a runaway thought is that it's running underground. What to do next Pick one conversation you have been putting off where start is the real subject, and have it before the week ends. 3. 03 Ask what the feeling is actually about. Usually it's three layers stacked: appropriate weight, self-image, and fear wearing someone else's face. 4. 04 The new sentence must be defensible to a skeptic on a bad day, or your nervous system will reject it inside an hour. What to do next Write your reframe as one sentence and read it back tomorrow morning. If it sounds like a slogan, it isn't done yet. 5. 05 Act on the reframe while the discomfort is still in your body. Waiting for the feeling to clear teaches your system that reframes are decorative. This shape has repeated in my life for years. A hire who was a great human and the wrong fit, sitting in a Monday one-on-one where we both already knew. A vendor I'd shared meals with, whose invoice I had to stop approving. A partnership that had run its useful life a quarter before I actually said so. The freshest version of it was that 6:47 a.m., staring at the third rewrite of a paragraph I couldn't send, about ending an engagement with a contractor I liked and had once floated a full-time seat for. Same shape as all the others. Different name on the calendar invite. And every time, guilt shows up on the same schedule and uses almost the same script. The story underneath it is usually a stack: you're breaking your word, you're hurting a good person for money, if you were a better founder this wouldn't be happening. Three sentences, layered. Each one feels true in the way early-morning sentences do. Guilt is my particular tax. I have delayed decisions by weeks because I couldn't stomach the feeling, and other people paid for that delay, in confusion, in false hope, in a runway that shrank while I stalled. That is not a small thing to admit. It is the actual cost of not having a framework for this. The framework below came out of my advanced NLP training. We were working on limiting beliefs and I went into a hypnosis session expecting to trace guilt back to some adult decision, a firing, a divorce, something with a clear timestamp. What surfaced instead was much older. The first place I could find the feeling was in the womb. I was my mother's first child, and the sense that came up, wordless, pre-language, was that I wasn't wanted. I don't offer that as a diagnosis of her; I have no way to know what she actually felt in 1972. I offer it as data about me. That is where my nervous system first learned the shape of guilt: as a felt sense that my existence itself was an imposition. Everything since has been a variation on that theme, dressed in whatever the current calendar invite happens to be called. Seeing it that clearly, in a training room with no real business decision on the line, was the first time I could tell the pattern from the personality. The load-bearing idea from NLP, which I also lean on in [I Am Statements And The Identity You Step Into](/blog/i-am-statements-and-the-identity-you-step-into), is that a thought is not a fact, it's a representation. Once you can name the representation cleanly, you can hold it, edit it, or replace it. The four steps below are how I turned that into something I can actually run when the paragraph won't send. This is not positive thinking. Positive thinking bounces off the wall on a hard day. This is something else. ## Step 1: Say The Honest Sentence Out Loud The first move is not to fight the thought. The first move is to catch it in a clean sentence and say it out loud. Not in your head. Out loud. To yourself in the car, to a notebook, to a walk, to your spouse if they're safe for it. Most of the pain of a runaway thought is that it's running underneath the surface. It hums. It colors everything. It picks the words you use in emails and the way you look at your calendar. The second you say it out loud, it stops being a mood and becomes a claim you can look at. That morning the honest sentence was: I am about to break my word to someone I like, because I built a business that can't hold the promise I made, and I feel guilty about it. Ugly. Specific. Mine. Saying it out loud did two things at once. It let me hear how much of it was true. It also let me hear how much of it was theater. Both matter for what comes next. The wrong version of Step 1 is the softened version. "I'm just feeling a little conflicted about a business decision." That sentence is a hostage negotiation with yourself, and the hostage wins. Say the ugly one. Name the actual feeling; for me, that word is almost always guilt. That's the one steering the day. For you the word might be shame, fear, obligation, anxiety, or resentment dressed as reluctance. The framework doesn't care which word it is. It cares that you name the real one instead of the polite one. ## Step 2: Ask What It's Actually About Once the sentence is out of your head and into the air, ask a question that sounds simple and isn't: what is this actually about? Not the surface answer. The one underneath. On the contractor decision, the surface answer was obvious: I'm about to end someone's engagement. The underneath answer took longer. What I was really feeling had three layers stacked on top of each other, and I had been treating all three as one. One layer was clean, appropriate weight. I'm the person whose decision changes another person's income this week. That is supposed to feel heavy. If it didn't, that would be the problem. One layer was self-image. I think of myself as someone who keeps his word, and the full-time conversation had made a soft promise in my own head. Pulling back on it felt like a rip in the fabric of who I think I am. That is not really about the contractor. That is about me. And one layer was pure fear, wearing his face. Cutting a cost I couldn't afford whispered "if you'd built this better you wouldn't have to." That whisper isn't about him at all. That is a founder anxiety pretending to be about someone else so it feels more noble. Underneath all three, on a bad day, is the oldest one: the wordless sense that taking up space is itself the offense. When I catch that one, I know I'm not actually deciding about the contractor anymore. I'm relitigating whether I get to exist. That is not a decision. That is a ghost. Naming it as a ghost is what lets me put it down and go back to the actual call. Once I could see the layers, the loop broke, because you cannot solve four different problems with one behavior. You can't call the contractor to fix a founder fear, and you certainly can't fix a 1972 feeling by keeping someone in a role that doesn't work. The same stack shows up in relationships, which is where I get it wrong most often. A tense conversation with my wife about how we spend a Saturday. The clean weight is real: my choice actually shapes her day, and hers shapes mine. The self-image layer is that I want to be the kind of husband who never disappoints her, so any small no feels like evidence against the identity. The fear-in-costume layer is older; it whispers that if I hold the line she'll pull away, which has nothing to do with Saturday. And underneath, on a bad week, the 1972 sentence again: my preferences are an imposition. Four different problems, one calendar. Same shape with a parent. The surface is a boundary about how often we talk, or a decision they disagree with. The clean weight is that they are getting older and time is not infinite. The self-image layer is the good-son or good-daughter story you have been running since you were nine. The fear-in-costume layer is the child version of you still trying to earn approval that was rationed in childhood. The old layer underneath is whatever your family taught you about whether wanting something for yourself was allowed. Same shape with a long-term friendship that has quietly stopped fitting. The clean weight is history, real history, decades of it. The self-image layer is that you are the loyal one, the friend who does not drift. The fear-in-costume layer is that letting the friendship rest means admitting a season of your life is actually over, which is a small grief you did not schedule. The oldest layer is whatever you first learned about being left. None of those four are the friendship itself. They are four different problems wearing one name. ### Real Guilt Vs Costume Guilt This is also where I usually catch my guilt for what it is. Real guilt tells you that you violated your own values and points at a repair. Most of what I call guilt in the moment isn't that. It's self-image protection, founder fear, and that oldest pre-verbal sense, all wearing a costume that looks noble. Real guilt is quiet and specific. Costume guilt is loud and general. The difference matters, because you handle them completely differently. Real guilt asks you to make something right. Costume guilt just asks you to stall. Sit here longer than feels efficient. This is the load-bearing step. ## Step 3: Find The Truer Sentence, Not The Nicer One Now, and only now, do you go looking for the reframe. The rule for this step is strict, and it's why most reframes fail: the new sentence has to be truer than the old one, not nicer. If it's just nicer, your nervous system will reject it inside an hour, and you'll be right back at 6:47 a.m. writing the same paragraph for a fourth morning. A truer sentence has three properties. It's specific to the situation, not a slogan. It accounts for the ugly parts of the old sentence instead of pretending they aren't there. And you can defend it to a skeptic without flinching. On the contractor decision, two reframes did the actual work. The first: clarity is the kind thing. Keeping someone in a seat that isn't working, or letting a full-time idea dangle when I can't fund it, isn't generosity. It's me postponing my own discomfort at his expense. Ending it cleanly is what frees him to go find the thing that fits. The kindest version of this is the honest one, done today. The second, borrowed from something I'd written a week earlier: [an ending isn't a failure, it's time doing its job](/blog/an-ending-isnt-a-failure-its-time-doing-its-job). This engagement was for a season. The season was over. Letting it end well was not a betrayal of it. It was respect for what it was. Both sentences are defensible on a bad day. Neither one requires me to lie about the fact that this was hard, or that money was part of it, or that I had once floated a bigger role. They just refuse to accept the guilt story as the whole truth. And neither one requires me to relitigate whether I get to be here. That's what a real reframe is. Not a nicer story. A truer, larger one that the old story fits inside of. ### Before You Move: A Ninety-Second Self-Check Before Step 4, run these five questions. Answer out loud, honestly. They take about ninety seconds and they will save you from acting on the sting and calling it clarity. 1. Am I the one making this decision, or the one it's being made about? If it's being made about you, Step 4 slows down; keep reading, but treat it as permission to wait. 2. Can I say the truer sentence without my voice shaking or my jaw tightening? A steady voice means the sentence has landed in your body. A shaking one means Step 3 isn't done yet. 3. If I act today, am I moving toward the truer sentence, or moving away from the discomfort? Toward is action. Away is escape wearing action's clothes. 4. Would I be comfortable if the other person read every draft I wrote before this one? If not, the version you're about to send is still carrying the earlier ones. Sit longer. 5. Is there a loss in this that deserves grieving before deciding? If the honest answer is yes, Step 4 is not a call to make today. It's a season to move through, and the decision comes later. If you can answer clean on all five, you're ready. If two or more are shaky, you're not acting yet, you're processing. That's not a failure of the framework. That is the framework telling you which version of Step 4 your situation calls for. ## Step 4: Act Before The Feeling Clears The last step is the one that separates a reframe from a journal entry. Once you have the truer sentence, act on it while the discomfort is still in your body. Not after you've slept on it one more night. Not after one more coffee. Now. There's a reason for the urgency. The nervous system is smart. If you find a truer sentence and then don't act on it, it learns that reframes are decorative. Next time, it will not hand you access to the calmer, clearer version of yourself. It will assume you were just performing. Acting while it still stings teaches the opposite lesson. It teaches your system that clarity and action come as a pair. Over time, the reframes get faster because your body starts to trust that they lead somewhere. I wrote the email that same morning. Led with the decision, kept it short, thanked him for the work he'd actually done, didn't hedge, didn't offer anything I couldn't honestly stand behind, and hit send before I could rewrite it a fifth time. The guilt didn't disappear before I hit send. It didn't need to. Acting rightly while it still stings is the whole thing. That is not the weak version. That is the mature one. From the outside, that email will read like a normal business decision, executed cleanly, in three short paragraphs. Anyone forwarding it around would call it professional and move on. From the inside, those three paragraphs are the visible tip of an hour of work I did on myself before I opened the draft, and of a hypnosis session years earlier that first showed me what I was actually carrying underneath decisions like this one. Steps one through three are what made step four small enough to send. That is the whole shape of the thing: quiet interior work, then one clean outward act that costs less than the stalling did. ### When You're The One Being Ended Step 4 changes shape when you're on the other side of it. If you're the one who just got the email, the layoff, the "we're going in a different direction" conversation from a partner, spouse, or friend, "act while it still stings" is exactly the wrong move. The urgency reverses. Your first job isn't to act. It's to receive. Receiving means letting the sentence land without answering it. Not agreeing, not arguing, not drafting the response in your head while they're still talking. Just letting the words be in the room. Most of the damage people do in these moments is committed in the first ten minutes, when the nervous system is trying to make the pain go away by producing a reaction, any reaction. A quick counteroffer, a cutting reply, a promise you don't mean, a story about the other person that you'll believe for months. Receiving is the discipline of not doing that. Then process, and give it more time than feels reasonable. Run the same first three steps, but slower. Say the honest sentence out loud, alone or with someone safe. Ask what it's actually about, knowing the layers here are usually rejection, self-image collapse, and something older about being left. Find the truer sentence, which almost never arrives on day one. On day one the sentence is still "this shouldn't be happening." The truer one comes later and it usually starts with "this is what actually is." Only then choose timing, and choose it on purpose. A response sent from the sting is a response you'll want back. A response sent after the sting has cooled but before you've gone numb is the one that ages well. For most endings that window opens somewhere between seventy-two hours and a couple of weeks, not the same afternoon. If a decision has to be made faster than that, make the smallest possible version of it, buy yourself time, and do the real work in the space you just created. The output when you're being ended is not a clean outward act. It's a clean interior one: a decision about who you are on the other side of this, made deliberately, before you send anything at all. ## Where This Framework Bends I want to be honest about the edges. This framework runs cleanly on decisions I'm the one making: hiring, firing, ending a partnership, pushing through mile 22, sending the email I've been rewriting for three days. It bends in three places. On grief, Step 4 slows down. There is no call to make, and "act before the feeling clears" is the wrong instruction. The honest sentence is often just "this hurts and it should," and the reframe isn't that the loss wasn't a loss but that carrying it well is part of honoring what was lost. The first three steps still apply. The fourth becomes letting the feeling move through you on its own schedule, not yours. What "slows down" means in practice depends on the kind of loss. After a breakup, Step 4 might be a season, not a step. The action isn't a decisive move; it's a set of small ones you keep making for months: not texting on the nights it would feel good to, keeping the routines that hold you up, letting the identity built around the relationship dissolve slowly instead of forcing a new one on top of it. After the death of someone close, Step 4 stretches further and looks less like action at all. The first year the honest sentence keeps changing, and the work is mostly letting it. Any decision you can honestly defer, defer. The moves that count come later, when you notice you can say the person's name without your chest closing, and only then do you start rebuilding the parts of life that had their shape in them. After an ending at work, a company you sold, a role you loved that ended, a team you built that dispersed, Step 4 compresses again but still doesn't belong on day one. Give it a few weeks before you decide what the next chapter looks like. The offers that arrive in the first two weeks are almost always the wrong ones, because you're choosing them from the sting instead of from the truer sentence that hasn't arrived yet. On relational reframes, marriage, a parent, a long friendship, Step 2's three layers don't map the same way. The stack there tends to be attachment history, an unmet need, and something older wearing the other person's face. The shape of the work is the same. The names of the layers are different, and rushing Step 4 in a relationship you actually want to keep is usually how you break it. And when you're the one being ended, laid off, left, passed over, Step 4 inverts. The mature move is often not to act immediately. The urgency belongs to the person who made the decision, not to you. Your work is Steps 1 through 3, held longer than feels tolerable, so that whatever you eventually do isn't a reaction dressed up as a choice. The framework is a tool, not a doctrine. Knowing where it bends is part of using it well, and knowing which version of it your situation calls for is where the work actually starts. ## Your Turn So pick the thought that's been running you this week. The one you keep looping on in the shower, on the drive, at 2 a.m. Not the abstract one. The specific one. Decide first which version of the framework it needs: the standard one if you're the one making the call, the slower one if you're grieving or being ended, the relational one if the other name on the page is someone you plan to keep in your life. Then run Steps 1 and 2 today: say the ugly sentence out loud, and sit with what it's actually about until the layers separate. Run Steps 3 and 4 on the timeline your situation calls for: find the truer sentence, then act on it when acting is the honest next move. That is the whole framework. The feeling won't fully leave before you act. It doesn't need to. ## The Takeaway Guilt isn't a verdict on your decision. It's a feeling with a job, and most of the time the job is to slow you down long enough to check whether the call is honest. Say the ugly sentence out loud so it stops running underneath you. Sort real guilt from costume guilt so you're not paying a tax that isn't yours. Find the truer sentence, not the nicer one, so the reframe holds on a bad day. Then act while it still stings, so your nervous system learns that clarity and action come as a pair. Do that consistently and guilt stops steering the business. It becomes one more piece of data on the way to a better decision. > “Guilt is my particular tax. I have delayed decisions by weeks because I couldn't stomach the feeling, and other people paid for that delay.” Sit with this - What thought have you been looping on this week that you have not yet said out loud in a full, ugly sentence? - When you look under that thought, which layer is doing the most work: appropriate weight, self-image, or fear wearing someone else's face? - What is a sentence about your situation that is truer than the one you've been carrying, that you could defend on a bad day? - What is the small action that would prove to your nervous system that clarity and action come as a pair? Frequently asked ### Is this the same as positive thinking? ### What if I can't find a truer sentence? ### Doesn't acting before the feeling clears just mean bulldozing through emotions? ### Where does this connect to your book? ### Does this work on grief, or only on decisions? ### For each edge case, what sentence should I actually replace in my draft? ### The book behind this framework The In-Between: Life in the Micro is my memoir about the space between the big events, and why the small moments are where the actual life happens. This four-step reframe is what I use to keep those moments from being run by stories that aren't true. [Get The In-Between on Amazon](https://www.amazon.com/Between-Life-Micro-Christian-Espinosa-ebook/dp/B0CP8RYV55) Share this essay [X ](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Fchristianespinosa.com%2Fblog%2Fhow-to-reframe-a-four-step-framework&text=How%20To%20Reframe%20A%20Hard%20Thought%20In%20Four%20Steps) [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fchristianespinosa.com%2Fblog%2Fhow-to-reframe-a-four-step-framework) [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fchristianespinosa.com%2Fblog%2Fhow-to-reframe-a-four-step-framework) [Email](mailto:?subject=How%20To%20Reframe%20A%20Hard%20Thought%20In%20Four%20Steps&body=https%3A%2F%2Fchristianespinosa.com%2Fblog%2Fhow-to-reframe-a-four-step-framework)Copy link ![Christian Espinosa, headshot](/__l5e/assets-v1/de07e44b-a8e0-4bcc-bcb0-13aec15421f1/headshot-front.jpg) About the author [Christian Espinosa](/about) · Founder & CEO, Blue Goat Cyber I'm the founder and CEO of Blue Goat Cyber, a medical device cybersecurity firm where my team has supported 250+ FDA submissions with zero failing to clear on cybersecurity. I previously founded and sold Alpine Security. I host The Med Device Cyber Podcast and wrote The Smartest Person in the Room and The In-Between: Life in the Micro, with Medical Device Cybersecurity: An In-Depth Guide out in 2026. Air Force Academy grad, 24x Ironman, climber of two of the Seven Summits. Keep reading - [ ### An Ending Isn't A Failure. It's Time Doing Its Job. Read essay → ](/blog/undefined) - [ ### I Am Statements And The Identity You Step Into Read essay → ](/blog/undefined) - [ ### Your Life Is The Sum Of Your Small Choices Read essay → ](/blog/undefined) - [ ### The Accident That Taught Me To Live In The In-Between Read essay → ](/blog/undefined) - [ ### You Can't Want It More Than They Do Read essay → ](/blog/undefined) [← Previous essay An Ending Isn't A Failure. It's Time Doing Its Job. ](/blog/an-ending-isnt-a-failure-its-time-doing-its-job) Related, Cybersecurity ### Need medical-device or offensive security expertise? Blue Goat Cyber, Christian's firm, runs FDA-aligned premarket submissions, penetration testing, and SBOM/SOUP analysis for medtech and high-stakes industries. [Explore Blue Goat Cyber](/cybersecurity) Christian Espinosa Bestselling author, keynote speaker, and Founding CEO of [Blue Goat Cyber](https://bluegoatcyber.com/). Helping technical leaders develop the soft skills that turn brilliance into impact. [](https://www.linkedin.com/in/christianespinosa/)[](https://x.com/Ironracer)[](https://www.instagram.com/christian.espinosa.official/)[](https://www.youtube.com/@ChristianEspinosaOfficial)[](https://www.facebook.com/christian.espinosa.official) Explore - [About](/about) - [Timeline](/timeline) - [Speaking](/speaking) - [Cybersecurity](/cybersecurity) - [Programs](/programs) Read - [Books](/books) - [Guides](/guides) - [Blog](/blog) - [Media](/media) - [Podcast Interviews](/podcasts) - [Success Stories](/success-stories) Connect - [Contact Christian](/connect) - [LinkedIn ↗](https://www.linkedin.com/in/christianespinosa/) - [Blue Goat Cyber ↗](https://bluegoatcyber.com/) - [Resources](/resources) © 2026 Christian Espinosa. All rights reserved. [Privacy](/privacy-policy)[Terms](/terms-of-use)